Anheuser-Busch Stops Clydesdale Horse Tail Docking


In a significant turn of events, Anheuser-Busch, the parent company of Budweiser, has officially ceased the controversial practice of cutting the tails of its renowned Clydesdale horses. This decision comes in the wake of mounting criticism from animal rights advocates and concerned individuals who raised ethical questions about this longstanding practice.

Anheuser-Busch's decision to discontinue the practice of tail docking, known as "equine tail docking," was confirmed in a recent statement: "The practice of equine tail docking was discontinued earlier this year. The safety and well-being of our beloved Clydesdales is our top priority."

The controversy surrounding the practice of tail docking had been brewing over the past year, with the beverage giant facing increasing backlash. Tail docking is a procedure that can involve the surgical removal of part of a horse's tailbone, often performed for cosmetic reasons.

One of the leading animal rights organizations, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), conducted an investigation that revealed that Budweiser's Clydesdale horses had their tails docked for cosmetic purposes.

Anheuser-Busch introduced its horse-drawn beer wagon in the 1930s to celebrate the repeal of Prohibition.

The practice of tailbone amputation for cosmetic purposes is banned in at least ten states in the United States, as well as in several countries. The American Veterinary Medical Association, a prominent authority on animal welfare, has unequivocally condemned the practice. The American Association of Equine Practitioners has similarly expressed its opposition to tailbone amputation for cosmetic reasons.

PETA has asserted that the docking procedure can be painful for the horses. The American Veterinary Medical Association, while acknowledging concerns about the procedure, has suggested that the primary issue lies in its unnecessary nature. Furthermore, the surgery restricts a horse's ability to fend off flies and biting insects using its tail, thus affecting its overall well-being.

The news of Anheuser-Busch's decision to discontinue the practice was met with enthusiasm by PETA, which issued a statement welcoming the development. In their statement, PETA mentioned their extensive efforts, including protests, nationwide ad campaigns, and the collective voices of more than 121,000 concerned consumers, as instrumental in achieving this change. They celebrated the decision by saying, "This victory comes after dozens of PETA protests, nationwide ad campaigns, and pleas from more than 121,000 concerned consumers, and it sends a message to other companies that animal abuse doesn’t sell."

Budweiser Clydesdale horses with shortened tails in Houston in 2014

Anheuser-Busch, renowned for its association with the iconic Budweiser Clydesdale horses, has a history dating back to the 1930s when it introduced its horse-drawn beer wagon as a celebratory gesture marking the repeal of Prohibition. These majestic Clydesdale horses have since become synonymous with the Budweiser brand and have played an integral role in the company's identity for over eight decades.

As stated on the Anheuser-Busch website, "From the Prohibition era to Super Bowl commercials, there is perhaps nothing more iconic in Budweiser’s storied history than its team of Clydesdale horses. More than just a mascot, the Clydesdales have been an integral part of Anheuser-Busch for more than 80 years."

In conclusion, Anheuser-Busch's decision to end the practice of tail docking for its Clydesdale horses reflects a significant shift in the company's approach to animal welfare. The move comes as a response to growing concerns and ethical considerations raised by animal rights advocates and the general public. It serves as a reminder that public awareness and activism can bring about meaningful change, even in long-established practices. This decision not only reflects a commitment to the well-being of these iconic horses but also sets a precedent for other companies to reconsider practices that may be deemed harmful or inhumane to animals.